EIPS WCF CD-ROM
 
Menu Items
Start Page · Search
Rome In the News
Answers (Q&A)
Audio Sermons
Photo Gallery
Our Guestbook
Articles
Errors of Rome
Caustic Comments
History Lessons
Rome & Politics
Contemporary
Feature Articles
Hitler's Pope
ECT Agreement
Sword (Bible)
How To Witness
EIPS Lectures
Other Interest



Sunday, August 20, 2017
Date Posted:
3/10/2006

Da Vinci Code


Part 1: Making a Money Mountain out of an Ant Hole: Mary Magdalene Hysteria


Dr Clive Gillis

COLUMBIA pictures is set to make a fortune from the film version of Dan Brown’s book, Da Vinci Code.

This production will introduce the masses to the theory that Mary Magdalene was Jesus’ wife.  The subject already has its own major website magdalene.org which sits alongside thousands of lesser ones seeking to popularise this view.

Rome’s ‘dark secret’

The hero in Brown’s novel, the Da Vinci Code, is a Harvard Professor called Robert Langdon.  According to the story, the Vatican and Opus Dei are seeking to silence Langdon because he is trying to expose how the Roman Church has, for centuries, been trying to conceal the bloodline from Jesus by his wife Mary Magdalene.  The title, the Da Vinci Code, derives from the belief that Leonardo Da Vinci’s Last Supper reveals, in coded form, that Leonardo knew Rome’s dark secret.

In the novel, Professor Langdon seeks help from one Sir Leigh Teabing. Teabing is clearly an anagram of Leigh and Baigent and Teabing’s fictitious physical characteristics resemble the third author of The Holy Blood and Holy Grail, Lincoln.

In the Da Vinci Code, Teabing introduces his heroes to The Holy Blood and Holy Grail saying, “this caused quite a stir in the 1980s . . . their fundamental premise is sound ... they finally brought the idea of Christ’s bloodline into the mainstream”.

According to the Da Vinci Code plot, the Church, “perpetuated [Mary Magdalene’s] image as a whore and buried evidence of Christ’s marriage to her;” thereby defusing any potential claims that Christ had a surviving bloodline and was a mortal prophet.

Ludicrous and repulsive

This whole theory is so ludicrous and repulsive that it seems hardly worth bothering with.  However the attack has recently gained impetus from a new book, The Magdalene Legacy, which appeals to a more intellectual section of the public and is selling well.  It claims to move the Mary Magdalene theory on to “extraordinary new levels”.

Rome’s rebuttal

Although the Vatican no longer has the power to seize every copy of Da Vinci Code and burn it, or place it on an Index of Forbidden Books, or punish its readers in the Inquisition, Rome has nevertheless acted.  First came a priestly campaign to dissuade Roman Catholics from reading it, which had little success.  Then in March 2005 an “official” rebuttal was announced.  This was to be penned by seventy‑year‑old Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Archbishop of Genoa.  But since then everything has gone the task too exhausting, or the Vatican are going to engineer a surprise launch to coincide with the release of the film in May, or whether Rome has simply developed cold feet, remains to be seen.

Why people can believe it

What gives credibility to the Da Vinci Code in the eyes of ordinary people is that they know full well that Rome does cover things up and hide them.  What is more, they immediately recognise the familiar, ugly tension between Rome’s two images of womanhood ‑ on the one hand the pure, unrealisable ideal of perfection, personified in the Virgin Mary, and, on the other hand, Rome’s (imaginary) despicable, debased harlot, Mary Magdalene, who represents ordinary womanhood which at best is barely redeemable.

The papyrus and the ant

The amazing thing is that this whole Mary Magdalene edifice is really balanced upon an obscure ancient papyrus peppered with ant holes.  This states, “And the companion of the [ant hole] Mary Magdalene [ant hole] loved her more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her often on her [ant hole).  The rest of the disciples [ant hole].  They said to him, ‘Why do you love her more than all of us?’  The Saviour answered and said to them, ‘Why do I not love you like her?  When a blind man and one who sees are both together in darkness they are no different from one another. When the light comes, then he who sees will see the light, and he who is blind will remain in darkness’.”  The question of who might have kissed Mary Magdalene is tantalising Mary Magdalene fans.  But they will never get the answer they crave because an ant has chewed a hole just at the most crucial point in the manuscript!

In the next issue we shall discover, DV, how this awful mess arose and why Rome, although bearing considerable responsibility for it, has much more to gain than money.

Back to Top

http://www.ianpaisley.org
Email: eips_info@yahoo.co.uk
Return to EIPS Main Menu


Menu Items
- Start Page · Search - Rome In the News - Answers (Q&A) - Audio Sermons - Photo Gallery - Our Guestbook 
- Errors of Rome - Caustic Comments - History Lessons - Rome & Politics - Contemporary - Feature Articles 
- Hitler's Pope - ECT Agreement - Sword (Bible) - How To Witness - EIPS Lectures 
Site best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0 in 800x600 resolution.
© 1999 Ian Paisley. All rights reserved.